climate and disaster risk assessment
Natural disasters that occur in the Municipality of Carmona are generally the result of atmospheric conditions such as heavy rainfall, thunderstorms, and tropical cyclones. These events can result in floods, landslides, and other incidents giving rise to casualties and disruption to properties and economic activities. Other noteworthy natural hazards present are the likelihood of a 7.2 Magnitude Earthquake and of ground rupture due to the existence of the West Valley Fault System that runs through the geographical jurisdiction of the Municipality. The consequences of any natural disaster and the countermeasures required to deal with it will vary according to the circumstances.
In May 2010, former President Macapagal Arroyo signed into law RA 10121 also known as the Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) Act of 2012. This law embedded the goal of Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015, an international effort of the United Nations (UN) through the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR), which is to mainstream resilience building against disasters not only in the national government but local communities as well. This also provides a legal basis for DRRM in the country and catalyzes the growth of policy and plan formulation, implementation of actions and measures pertaining to all aspects of disaster risk reduction and management, including good governance, risk assessment and early warning, knowledge building, and awareness-raising, reducing underlying risk factors, and preparedness for effective response and early recovery.
In response, Carmona organized its Municipal Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (MDRRMC) followed by the creation of the Municipal Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Office (MDRRMO) to oversee the entirety of DRRM in the Municipality.
Climate change impacts
The changing climate practically affects all societies and ecosystems in a broad variety of ways. Changes in climate alter rainfall, influence crop yields, human health, cause changes to forests and other vegetation, and strain our energy supply. Warming temperatures, changes in precipitation, and increases in the frequency or intensity of some extreme weather events such as typhoons threaten our health by affecting the food we eat, the water we drink, the air we breathe, and the weather we experience.
Increases in the incidence of climate-related diseases and illnesses can be expected vis-à-vis access to critical point facilities such as clinics and hospitals. Natural resource-based production will be severely affected since higher inputs but low outputs will be common due to extreme temperatures and varying precipitations. The proliferation of pests and crop diseases will also be expected due to climatic changes. Clogged drainages resulting in persistent floods due to extreme rainfall events in urban areas particularly those with low vegetation and a high percentage of concretized spaces will be common.
Power consumption, especially during months with high temperatures and hot days will increase drastically resulting in higher costs. Water will also be scarce due to competing usage.
Hazard inventory
The Municipality is susceptible to a number of hazards such as flooding, rain-induced landslide (RIL), ground rupture, ground shaking, liquefaction, earthquake-induced landslide (EIL), El Nino (drought), and pest infestation (rice black bug). Based on present assessments from various governmental agencies, the susceptibility, magnitude, speed of onset, frequency, and the areas covered are shown in Table 1. Among the hazards identified, ground shaking poses the highest degree of impact covering the whole Municipality. Based on the REDAS study, Carmona is expecting an earthquake with a magnitude of 8.0 destroying thousands of properties, billions on economic value, thousands injured, and hundreds dead. In terms of flooding, a variation on available data shows that only a few portions of Barangay Maduya and Cabilang Baybay will be inundated.
Table 1. Hazard Inventory Matrix, Municipality of Carmona, Province of Cavite
Hazard | Map Information | Hazard Description | ||||
Source | Susceptibility | Magnitude | Speed of Onset | Frequency and/or Duration | Areas Covered | |
Flood Susceptibility | NAMRIA, REDAS | High |
| Slow | 1 day | Barangays 1-13 |
Ground Rupture | PHIVOLCS | Active Fault-Certain |
| Lantic, Mabuhay, Cabilang Baybay | ||
Active Fault- Inferred |
| Lantic | ||||
Active Fault – Concealed |
| Lantic | ||||
With Downthrown Area |
| Lantic, Milagrosa, Mabuhay | ||||
Ground Shaking | PHIVOLCS | PEIS VIII & above | 7.0 & higher | Fast | Less than a minute | 14 barangays |
Liquefaction | NAMRIA, REDAS | Moderate |
| Portion of Maduya | ||
Low |
|
|
| Poblacion 1-8 and Portion of Maduya, Cabilang Baybay, Mabuhay &Milagrosa | ||
Drought | DA | Medium – High |
| Slow | 4 months | Barangays Maduya, Mabuhay, Milagrosa, Bancal & Lantic |
Others (Pest Infestation – Rice Black Bug | DA | Medium – High |
| Creeping | 4 months | Barangays Maduya, Mabuhay, Milagrosa, Bancal & Lantic |
Hazard inventory
Depicted in Table 117 is the inventory of Hazards present in each barangay. As shown, all barangays will be affected by ground shaking due to the presence of the West Valley Fault System (WVS).
Table 2. Hazard Susceptibility Inventory Matrix, Municipality of Carmona, Province of Cavite
Barangay | Ground shaking | Ground Rupture | Liquefaction | Flood | Drought | Pest Infestation |
Poblacion 1 | ✓ |
| ✓ | ✓ |
|
|
Poblacion 2 | ✓ |
| ✓ | ✓ |
|
|
Poblacion 3 | ✓ |
| ✓ | ✓ |
|
|
Poblacion 4 | ✓ |
| ✓ | ✓ |
|
|
Poblacion 5 | ✓ |
| ✓ | ✓ |
|
|
Poblacion 6 | ✓ |
| ✓ | ✓ |
|
|
Poblacion 7 | ✓ |
| ✓ | ✓ |
|
|
Poblacion 8 | ✓ |
| ✓ | ✓ |
|
|
Maduya | ✓ |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Cabilang Baybay | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
|
|
Mabuhay | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Milagrosa | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Lantic | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Bancal | ✓ |
|
|
| ✓ | ✓ |
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure database for ground shaking
The exposure database provides baseline information to all elements at risk such as: population, assets, structures, economic activities and environmental resources which are located in areas exposed to potential impacts of ground shaking. This determines the number of affected individuals, structures, and extent of areas located within hazard susceptible areas. As shown in Table 91, all barangays in Carmona are affected by ground shaking.
Table 3. Ground Shaking Population Attribute Database (Exposure Indicators), Municipality of Carmona, Cavite
Barangay | Total Land Area (Hectares) | Residential Area (Hectares) | Exposure indicators | |||
Barangay Population | Population Density per Hectare of Residential Area | |||||
Total Male | Total Female | Total Population | ||||
Barangay 1 | 12.93 | 10.24 | 1527 | 1548 | 3075 | 300.2929688 |
Barangay 2 | 3.27 | 3.25 | 329 | 311 | 640 | 196.9230769 |
Barangay 3 | 2.69 | 3.2 | 382 | 390 | 772 | 241.25 |
Barangay 4 | 3 | 3.82 | 294 | 331 | 625 | 163.6125654 |
Barangay 5 | 2.46 | 2.6 | 283 | 313 | 596 | 229.2307692 |
Barangay 6 | 2.78 | 2.56 | 393 | 382 | 775 | 302.734375 |
Barangay 7 | 2.38 | 2.16 | 310 | 356 | 666 | 308.3333333 |
Barangay 8 | 15.56 | 6.19 | 1459 | 1492 | 2951 | 476.7366721 |
Barangay 9 | 255.37 | 40.59 | 4912 | 5089 | 10001 | 246.3907366 |
Barangay 10 | 434.2 | 222.97 | 3407 | 3517 | 6924 | 31.05350496 |
Barangay 11 | 369.22 | 85.38 | 4455 | 4581 | 9036 | 105.8327477 |
Barangay 12 | 95.07 | 41.71 | 11246 | 11573 | 22819 | 547.0870295 |
Barangay 13 | 1363.69 | 167 | 8157 | 8451 | 16608 | 99.4491018 |
Barangay 14 | 405.18 | 62.77 | 6371 | 6237 | 12608 | 200.8602836 |
Total | 2,967.8 | 654.44 | 43,525 | 44,571 | 88,096 | 134.61 |
Ground Shaking Hazard Map
Barangay | Adaptive capacity | |||||
Wealth | Information | Infrastructure | Technology | Institution and Governance | Social Capital | |
Barangay 1 | – All barangays have 5% budget allocation for Gender and Development (GAD ) and Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) – The Local Government Unit may also provide assistance thru its 5% budget allocation for GAD and DRRM – Provision of livelihood support – Provision of health and educational services – Provision of disaster relief services | – Regular conduct of Community-Based Monitoring System (CBMS) – National Household Targeting System for Poverty Reduction (NHTS-PR) – Conduct of appropriate training and seminars on ground shaking and its related hazards – Establishment of Local Monitoring System (LMS) – Conduct of information, education and communication (IEC) campaigns | – Placement and implementation of Early Warning Systems (EWS) – Establishment of permanent evacuation center/s – Institution of relocation programs – Retrofitting programs | – Conduct and continuous updating of Rapid Earthquake and Disaster Assessment thru REDAS -Securing of an earthquake intensity meter | – Adoption and implementation of RA 10121 – Strict enforcement of the National Building Code -Institution of local disaster risk reduction policies – Review and implementation of local Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) – Updating and strict implementation of Local Zoning Ordinance | – Strengthening and development of appropriate programs thru Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) – Sourcing out CSO-PO partnership networks – Sourcing and establishing Academe Partners – Mandatory creation and mobilization of rescue teams for highly susceptible organizations (i.e. industries, groups, company, etc.) |
Barangay 2 | ||||||
Barangay 3 | ||||||
Barangay 4 | ||||||
Barangay 5 | ||||||
Barangay 6 | ||||||
Barangay 7 | ||||||
Barangay 8 | ||||||
Barangay 9 | ||||||
Barangay 10 | ||||||
Barangay 11 | ||||||
Barangay 12 | ||||||
Barangay 13 | ||||||
Barangay 14 |
Table 4. Disaster Risk Assessment (DRA) Population Exposure Table, Municipality of Carmona, Cavite
Hazard: Ground Shaking
Barangay | Hazard | Exposure | ||||||||
Susceptibility |
Likelihood of Occurrence |
Event parameter intensity
| Barangay population | Estimated residential area (has) | Residential area to population density (persons/has) e/f | Affected area (has) | Affected population GxH | Exposure Percentage i/e | ||
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | |
Barangay 1 | HSA | 1 | 8 | 3,075 | 10.24 | 300.29 | 10.24 | 3,075 | 100.00% | |
Barangay 2 | HSA | 1 | 8 | 640 | 3.25 | 196.92 | 3.25 | 640 | 100.00% | |
Barangay 3 | HSA | 1 | 8 | 772 | 3.20 | 241.25 | 3.20 | 772 | 100.00% | |
Barangay 4 | HSA | 1 | 8 | 625 | 3.82 | 163.61 | 3.82 | 625 | 100.00% | |
Barangay 5 | HSA | 1 | 8 | 596 | 2.60 | 229.23 | 2.60 | 596 | 100.00% | |
Barangay 6 | HSA | 1 | 8 | 775 | 2.56 | 302.73 | 2.56 | 775 | 100.00% | |
Barangay 7 | HSA | 1 | 8 | 666 | 2.16 | 308.33 | 2.16 | 666 | 100.00% | |
Barangay 8 | HSA | 1 | 8 | 2951 | 6.19 | 476.74 | 6.19 | 2,951 | 100.00% | |
Barangay 9 | HSA | 1 | 8 | 10001 | 40.59 | 246.39 | 40.59 | 10,001 | 100.00% | |
Barangay 10 | HSA | 1 | 8 | 6924 | 222.97 | 31.05 | 222.97 | 6,924 | 100.00% | |
Barangay 11 | HSA | 1 | 8 | 9036 | 85.38 | 105.83 | 85.38 | 9,036 | 100.00% | |
Barangay 12 | HSA | 1 | 8 | 22,819 | 41.71 | 547.09 | 41.71 | 22,819 | 100.00% | |
Barangay 13 | HSA | 1 | 8 | 16,608 | 167.00 | 99.45 | 167.00 | 16,608 | 100.00% | |
Barangay14 | HSA | 1 | 8 | 12608 | 62.77 | 200.86 | 62.77 | 12,608 | 100.00% |
Table 5. Ground Shaking Critical Facilities Database, Municipality of Carmona
Barangay | Exposure indicators | Sensitivity indicators | ||||||
Type | Name | Area | Estimated Construction Cost (PhP) | Capacity | Wall Materials Used | Existing Condition | Structure Employing Hazard Resistant Design | |
1 | Health Center | Brgy. 1 Health Center | 50 | 700,000 | 20 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes |
Brgy. Hall | Brgy Hall | 120 | 1,600,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
2 | Day Care Center | Brgy. 2 Day Care Center |
|
| 20 children | Concrete | Good | Yes |
Hospital | Pagamutang Bayan ng Carmona |
|
| 25 beds | Concrete | Fair | Yes | |
Brgy. Hall | Barangay Hall | 110 | 1,500,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
3 | Brgy. Hall | Brgy. Hall | 96 | 1,800,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes |
4 | Health Center | Main Health Center | 560 | 11,000,000 | 150 patients | Concrete | Very Good | Yes |
Government Building | Municipal Hall | 2150 | 34,000,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
Evacuation | Hon. Marciano Mapanoo Park | 1680 | 10,000,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
Brgy. Hall | Brgy Hall | 120 | 1,600,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
5 | Brgy. Hall | Brgy Hall | 70 | 1,100,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes |
6 | Brgy. Hall | Barangay Hall | 80 | 1,350,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes |
7 | Brgy. Hall | Barangay Hall | 130 | 2,200,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes |
8 | Day Care Center | Rosario Day Care Center | 56 | 700,000 | 15 children | Concrete | Good | Yes |
Health Center | Barangay 8 Health Center | 56 | 700,000 | 30 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |
School | Carmona Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
Carmona National High School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 120 | 1,500,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
9 | Bridge | Maduya-Soro-Soro Bridge |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes |
SLEX Bridge |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
CPM Bridge |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Government Building | DILG Compound | 1 626 | 25,000,000 |
| Concrete |
| Yes | |
Day Care Center | Maduya Day Care Center | 110 | 1,100,000 | 25 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |
Health Center | Maduya Health Center | 120 | 1,100,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
School | Maduya Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
CvSU |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Barangay Hall | Maduya Barangay Hall | 150 | 2,000,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
10 | Day Care Center | Hon. Marcelino L. Basbas Sr. DCC | 70 | 900,000 | 30 children | Concrete | Good | Yes |
Health Center | Barangay CabilangBaybay Health Center | 56 | 500,000 | 40 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |
School | CabilangBaybay Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 160 | 2,000,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
11 | Bridge | Mabuhay Bridge |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes |
Day Care Center | Mabuhay Day Care Center | 70 | 900,000 | 30 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |
Health Center | Mabuhay Health Center | 100 | 1,400,000 | 50 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |
School | Mabuhay Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 200 | 2,500,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
12 | Bridge | Milagrosa Bridge (MC) |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes |
Milagrosa-Lantic Bridge |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Day Care Center | Milagrosa Proper Day Care Center | 64 | 850,000 | 15 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |
Phase 4 Day Care Center | 90 | 1,400,000 | 25 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Phase 3 Day Care Center | 64 | 850,000 | 25 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Phase 2 Day Care Center | 56 | 650,000 | 25 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Health Center | Milagrosa Health Center | 114 | 3,000,000 | 70 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |
Phase 3 Health Center | 72 | 1,100,000 | 30 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Phase 4 Health Center | 96 | 1,700,000 | 50 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
School | Milagrosa Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
Milagrosa West Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 240 | 4, 000, 000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes
| |
13 | Bridge | Cedar Bridge | 50 |
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes |
Day Care Center | Lantic Day Care Center | 70 | 900,000 | 30 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |
Paligawan Matanda Day Care Center | 70 | 900,000 | 30 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Davilan Day Care Center | 42 | 450,000 | 10 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Health Center | Lantic Health Center | 64 | 1,000,000 | 50 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |
Carmona Estate Health Center | 100 | 1,250,000 | 50 patients | Concrete | Very Good | Yes | ||
PaligawanMatanda Health Center | 105 | 1,600,000 | 30 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
School | Lantic Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
Barangay Hall | Lantic Barangay Hall | 240 | 3,850,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
14 | Bridge | Bancal Bridge | 935 | 80,000,000 | 20 Tons | Concrete | Good | Yes |
Day Care Center | San Agustin Day Care Center | 70 | 900,000 | 30 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |
Health Center | Bancal Health Center | 115 | 1,380,000 | 100 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |
School | Bancal Elem. School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 240 | 2,500,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes |
Table 6. Disaster Risk Assessment Summary Matrix
Hazard: Ground Shaking
Decision Area/s | Technical Findings | Implications | Policy Interventions |
A | B | C | D |
All Lifelines | 1. Categorized as low risk but the impact is severe affecting all lifelines in the Municipality particularly bridges. 2. Disruption of access system may last particularly bridges may last for days up to a month, affecting settlements and production areas | 1. Temporary isolation of communities due to long-term disruption of the access system due to ground shaking 2. Poses difficulty in evacuation and response making which may lead to death and injuries in isolated areas 3. Major disruption in the transportation of agricultural and industrial produce resulting in potential losses | 1. Strategic establishment of alternate/escape routes leading to relatively safer areas 2. Hazard proofing/reinforcement of lifeline facilities particularly bridges and national highways 3. Establishment and institution of partner CSOs for immediate rehabilitation 4. Formulation and institution of earthquake contingency plan |
All Population | 1. Population that will be severely affected by ground shaking are as follows: 4% living in makeshift houses; 31% are young and old; 0.7% are with disabilities; 4.9% are living below poverty threshold, and close to 1% are malnourished | 1. As per REDAS, a total of 256 deaths, 4,924 injuries and 1,000 people will be missing in the event of intensity 8 earthquake | 1. Conduct of regular earthquake drills and simulation exercises in all locations 2. Conduct of IEC campaigns to inform populace of what to do, before, during and after an earthquake 3. Capacitation and formation of rescue teams in every barangays and other sub-levels in the community |
Decision Area/s | Technical Findings | Implications | Policy Interventions |
A | B | C | D |
All Critical Facilities All Urban Use | 1. The risk for all critical facilities and urban use was determined low however, the severity of impact is very high. 2. The conditions of all infrastructures are generally good as most are newly constructed and/or rehabilitated. 3. There are a number of makeshift houses. | 1. It is assumed that in a worst case scenario, 800 makeshift houses will be destroyed while 400 makeshift dwellings will be partially damaged. 2. There will be a total of 345 million of damages to critical facilities. 3. Most urban use will be affected. | 1. Regular monitoring, rehabilitation and retrofitting of all infrastructures following the standards of the National Building Code. 2. Mandatory relocation of people living in makeshift housing and/or improvement/rehabilitation. |
Exposure database for ground rupture
A small fault line was recorded along San Lazaro Drive between Governor’s Drive and Carmona River in Brgy. Mabuhay. Several fault lines were discovered downhill at the Canyon Ranch Residence at the San Lazaro Drive and outside Carmona Estates in Lantic as it course along the Carmona River southwards. It is located at the boundary between Silang, Cavite and Biñan, Laguna.
Table 7. Ground Rupture Population Attribute Database (Exposure Indicators), Municipality of Carmona
</table class=”table table-striped” >
Barangay | Total Land Area (Hectares) | Residential Area (Hectares) | Exposure indicators | |||||||
Barangay Population | Population Density per Hectare of Residential Area | |||||||||
Total Male | Total Female | Total Population | ||||||||
Barangay 10 | 434.2 | 222.97 | 3407 | 3517 | 6924 | 31.05350496 | ||||
Barangay 11 | 369.22 | 85.38 | 4455 | 4581 | 9036 | 105.8327477 | ||||
Barangay 12 | 95.07 | 41.71 | 11246 | 11573 | 22819 | 547.0870295 | ||||
Barangay 13 | 1,363.69 | 167 | 8157 | 8451 | 16608 | 99.4491018 | ||||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Barangay | ADAPTIVE CAPACITY | |||||||||
Wealth | Information | Infrastructure | Technology | Institution and Governance | Social Capital | |||||
10 | – All barangays have 5% budget allocation for Gender and Development (GAD ) and Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) – The Local Government Unit may also provide assistance thru its 5% budget allocation for GAD and DRRM – Provision of livelihood support – Provision of health and educational services – Provision of disaster relief services | – Regular conduct of Community-Based Monitoring System (CBMS) – National Household Targeting System for Poverty Reduction (NHTS-PR) – Conduct of appropriate trainings and seminars on ground shaking and its related hazards – Establishment of Local Monitoring System (LMS) – Conduct of information, education and communication (IEC) campaigns | – placement and implementation of Early Warning Systems (EWS) – Establishment of permanent evacuation center/s – Institution of relocation programs – Retrofitting programs | – Conduct and continuous updating of Rapid Earthquake and Disaster Assessment thru REDAS -Securing of an earthquake intensity meter | – Adoption and implementation of RA 10121 – Strict enforcement of the National Building Code -Institution of local disaster risk reduction policies – Review and implementation of local Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) – Updating and strict implementation of Local Zoning Ordinance | – Strengthening and development of appropriate programs thru Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) – Sourcing out CSO-PO partnership networks – Sourcing and establishing Academe Partners – Mandatory creation and mobilization of rescue teams for highly susceptible organizations (i.e. industries, groups, company, etc.) | ||||
11 | ||||||||||
12 | ||||||||||
13 | ||||||||||
Barangay | Exposure indicators | Sensitivity indicators | ||||||||
Type | Name | Area (Sq. Meters) | Capacity (Classrooms, Bed Capacity, Loading Capacity) | Wall Materials Used | Existing Condition | Structure Employing Hazard Resistant Design | ||||
Brgy10
| Bridge | Southwoods Drive Bridge | 900 | 20 Tons | Concrete | Poor | Yes | |||
Day Care Center | ML Basbas Sr. Day Care Center | 100 | 112 students | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Health Center | BHS | 20 | 1 bed | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Schools | CABES | 3625 | 48 classrooms | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Brgy 11
| Bridge
| Mabuhay-Milagrosa Bridge | 102 | 20 Tons | Concrete | Poor | Yes | |||
Cityland-Mabuhay Bridge | 84 | 10 Tons | Concrete | Fair | Yes | |||||
Day Care Center | Mabuhay Day Care Center | 80 | 80 students | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Health Center | BHS | 12 | 1 bed | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Schools | MABES | 4695 | 24 classrooms | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Brgy 12
| Bridge | Milagrosa-Lantic Bridge | 264 | 20 Tons | Steel | Fair | Yes | |||
Day Care Center
| Milagrosa Proper Day Care Center | 60 | 70 students | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Phase 2 Day Care Center | 80 | 41 students | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||||
Phase 3 Day Care Center | 100 | 90 students | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||||
Phase 4 Day Care Center | 80 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||||
Health Center
| Brgy Proper BHS | 12 | 1 bed | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Phase 3 BHS | 12 | 1 bed | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||||
Phase 4 BHS | 16 | 1 bed | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||||
Schools
| MILES Main | 2946 | 20 classrooms | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
MILES West | 1280 | 20 classrooms | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||||
Brgy 13
| Bridge
| Kinnari Bridge | 300 | 20 Tons | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
MJC Bridge 1 | 300 | 20 Tons | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||||
MJC Bridge 2 | 300 | 20 Tons | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||||
MJC Bridge 3 | 300 | 20 Tons | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||||
Lantic Day Care Center | 120 | 122 students | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||||
Davilan Day Care Center | 80 | 18 students | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||||
PaligawanMatanda Day Care Center | 80 | 41 students | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||||
Health Center
| Lantic Proper BHS | 16 | 1 bed | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Carmona Estates BHS | 16 | 1 bed | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||||
Paligawan BHS | 12 | 1 bed | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||||
Schools
| LANES | 5000 | 23 classrooms | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Paligawan Elem. School | 5000 | 7 classrooms | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||||
Evacuation Center | Carmona Sports Center | 3025 | 1210 person | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Barangay | Exposure indicator | Sensitivity indicators | ||||||||
Road Name | Road Classification | Replacement Cost per linear kilometer | Surface Type | Existing Condition | Hazard Resistant Design | |||||
Brgy 10 | Governor’s Drive | National road | 19,840,000 | Concrete | Fair | YES | ||||
San Roque | Barangay | 4,710,000 | Concrete | Poor | YES | |||||
San Marcelino-West | Barangay | 7,250,000 | Asphalt | Poor | No | |||||
San Marcelino-East | Barangay | 8,990,000 | Asphalt | Poor | No | |||||
Brgy 11 | Governor’s Drive | National road | 32,160,000 | Concrete | Good | YES | ||||
Sugar Road | Barangay | 28,060,000 | Concrete | Fair | YES | |||||
Hebron | Barangay | 1,770,000 | Concrete | Fair | YES | |||||
JM Loyola St | Municipal | 12,470,000 | Concrete | Good | YES | |||||
Brgy 12
| Sta. Maria | Barangay | 10,510,000 | Concrete | Fair | YES | ||||
Sta. Rosa | Barangay | 5,070,000 | Concrete | Fair | YES | |||||
Patindig-Araw | Barangay | 9,380,000 | Concrete | Poor | No | |||||
Domingo C Carillo Sr | Barangay | 12,070,000 | Concrete | Fair | No | |||||
Brgy 13 | Alfonso Macha | Barangay | 12,120,000 | Asphalt | Poor | No | ||||
Paligawan Bata | Barangay | 28,190,000 | Asphalt | Poor | No | |||||
Bonifacio Masungsong | Barangay | 38,500,000 | Earth/Gravel | Poor | No | |||||
Davilan | Barangay | 6,380,000 | Earth/Gravel | Poor | No | |||||
Decision Area/s | Technical Findings | Implications | Policy Interventions | |||||||
A | B | C | D | |||||||
All Critical Facilities All Urban Use All Population | 1. Determined ground rupture located at Barangay Cabilang Baybay, Milagrosa, Mabuhay and Lantic are mostly at idle/open areas with minimal infrastructures. 2. Affected Urban use includes unoccupied commercial lots, makeshift housings for workers and portion of the race track located at the Manila Jockey Club. | 1. Traversed areas particularly with establishments will be severely damaged. | 1. Mandatory establishment and implementation of 5 meter buffer zones on both sides of the fault line. 2. Prohibition of establishment in and within the fault lines and its buffer zones. | |||||||
Barangay | Total Land Area (Hectares) | Residential Area (Hectares) | EXPOSURE INDICATORS | |||||||
Barangay Population | Population Density per Hectare of Residential Area | |||||||||
Total Male | Total Female | Total Population | ||||||||
Barangay 1 | 12.93 | 10.24 | 1527 | 1548 | 3075 | 300.2929688 | ||||
Barangay 2 | 3.27 | 3.25 | 329 | 311 | 640 | 196.9230769 | ||||
Barangay 3 | 2.69 | 3.2 | 382 | 390 | 772 | 241.25 | ||||
Barangay 4 | 3 | 3.82 | 294 | 331 | 625 | 163.6125654 | ||||
Barangay 5 | 2.46 | 2.6 | 283 | 313 | 596 | 229.2307692 | ||||
Barangay 6 | 2.78 | 2.56 | 393 | 382 | 775 | 302.734375 | ||||
Barangay 7 | 2.38 | 2.16 | 310 | 356 | 666 | 308.3333333 | ||||
Barangay 8 | 15.56 | 6.19 | 1459 | 1492 | 2951 | 476.7366721 | ||||
Barangay 9 | 255.37 | 40.59 | 4912 | 5089 | 10001 | 246.3907366 | ||||
Barangay 10 | 434.2 | 222.97 | 3407 | 3517 | 6924 | 31.05350496 | ||||
Barangay 11 | 369.22 | 85.38 | 4455 | 4581 | 9036 | 105.8327477 | ||||
Barangay 12 | 95.07 | 41.71 | 11246 | 11573 | 22819 | 547.0870295 | ||||
Barangay 13 | 1363.69 | 167 | 8157 | 8451 | 16608 | 99.4491018 | ||||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Brgy | Adaptive capacity | |||||||||
Wealth | Information | Infrastructure | Technology | Institution and Governance | Social Capital | |||||
Brgy 1 | – All barangays have 5% budget allocation for Gender and Development (GAD ) and Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) – The Local Government Unit may also provide assistance thru its 5% budget allocation for GAD and DRRM – Provision of livelihood support – Provision of health and educational services – Provision of disaster relief services | – Regular conduct of Community-Based Monitoring System (CBMS) – National Household Targeting System for Poverty Reduction (NHTS-PR) – Conduct of appropriate trainings and seminars on ground shaking and its related hazards – Establishment of Local Monitoring System (LMS) – Conduct of information, education and communication (IEC) campaigns | – Placement and implementation of Early Warning Systems (EWS) – Establishment of permanent evacuation center/s – Institution of relocation programs – Retrofitting programs | – Conduct and continuous updating of Rapid Earthquake and Disaster Assessment thru REDAS -Securing of an earthquake intensity meter | – Adoption and implementation of RA 10121 – Strict enforcement of the National Building Code -Institution of local disaster risk reduction policies – Review and implementation of local Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) – Updating and strict implementation of Local Zoning Ordinance | – Strengthening and development of appropriate programs thru Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) – Sourcing out CSO-PO partnership networks – Sourcing and establishing Academe Partners – Mandatory creation and mobilization of rescue teams for highly susceptible organizations (i.e. industries, groups, company, etc.) | ||||
Brgy 2 | ||||||||||
Brgy 3 | ||||||||||
Brgy 4 | ||||||||||
Brgy 5 | ||||||||||
Brgy 6 | ||||||||||
Brgy 7 | ||||||||||
Brgy 8 | ||||||||||
Brgy 9 | ||||||||||
Brgy 10 | ||||||||||
Brgy 11 | ||||||||||
Brgy 12 | ||||||||||
Brgy 13 | ||||||||||
BRGY | Exposure indicators | Sensitivity indicators | ||||||||
Number of Farming Dependent Households | Total Area Allocation | Dominant Crop/ Variety of Produce | Average Output Per Hectare | Number of Farming Families who Attended Climate Field School | Percentage of Farming Families Using Sustainable Production Techniques | Percentage of Farmers with Access to Hazard Information | Percentage of Production Areas with Infra structure Coverage | Percentage Areas with Irrigation Coverage | Percentage Areas with Water Impoundment | |
Brgy 9 | 45 | 98.00 | rice | 95,000.00 | 10 | 50% | 60% | 1 | 100% | 40% |
Brgy 10 | 2 | 1.00 | mango | 250,000.00 | 0 | 50% | 60% | 0 | 0% | 0% |
Brgy 11 | 17 | 29.00 | Banana | 150,000.00 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Brgy 12 | 23 | 3.50 | Banana | 150,000.00 | 5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Brgy 13 | 20 | 101.00 | rice | 95,000.00 | 10 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRGY | Exposure indicators | Sensitivity indicators | ||||||||
Type | Name | Area | Estimated Construction Cost (PhP) | Capacity | Wall Materials Used | Existing Condition | Structure Employing Hazard Resistant Design | |||
Brgy 1 | Health Center | Brgy. 1 Health Center | 50 | 700,000 | 20 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Brgy Hall | Brgy. Hall | 120 | 1,600, 000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Brgy 2 | Day Care Center | Brgy. 2 Day Care Center |
|
| 20 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Hospital | Pagamutang Bayan ng Carmona |
|
| 25 beds | Concrete | Fair | Yes | |||
Brgy Hall | Brgy. Hall | 110 | 1,500, 000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Brgy 3 | Brgy Hall | Brgy. Hall | 96 | 1,800, 000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Brgy 4 | Health Center | Main Health Center | 560 | 11,000, 000 | 150 patients | Concrete | Very Good | Yes | ||
Government Building | Municipal Hall | 2150 | 34,000, 000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Evacuation | Hon. Marciano Mapanoo Park | 1680 | 10,000,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 120 | 1,600, 000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Brgy 5 | Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 70 | 1,100, 000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Brgy 6 | Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 80 | 1,350, 000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Brgy 7 | Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 130 | 2,200, 000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Brgy 8 | Day Care Center | Rosario Day Care Center | 56 | 700, 000 | 15 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Health Center | Barangay 8 Health Center | 56 | 700,000 | 30 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
School | Carmona Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Carmona National High School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 120 | 1,500, 000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Brgy 9 | Bridge | Maduya Bridge |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
SLEX Bridge |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
CPM Bridge |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Government Building | DILG Compound | 1 626 | 25,000, 000 |
| Concrete |
| Yes | |||
Day Care Center | Maduya Day Care Center | 110 | 1,100, 000 | 25 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Health Center | Maduya Health Center | 120 | 1,100, 000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
School | Maduya Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
CvSU |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Barangay Hall | Maduya Barangay Hall | 150 | 2,000, 000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Brgy 10 | Day Care Center | Hon. Marcelino L. Basbas Sr. DCC | 70 | 900,000 | 30 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Health Center | Barangay Cabilang Baybay Health Center | 56 | 500,000 | 40 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
School | Cabilang Baybay Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 160 | 2,000,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Brgy 11 | Bridge | Mabuhay Bridge |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Day Care Center | Mabuhay Day Care Center | 70 | 900,000 | 30 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Health Center | Mabuhay Health Center | 100 | 1,400,000 | 50 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
School | Mabuhay Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 200 | 2,500,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Brgy 12 | Bridge | Milagrosa Bridge (MC) |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Milagrosa-Lantic Bridge |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Day Care Center | Milagrosa Proper Day Care Center | 64 | 850,000 | 15 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Phase 4 Day Care Center | 90 | 1,400,000 | 25 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Phase 3 Day Care Center | 64 | 850,000 | 25 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Phase 2 Day Care Center | 56 | 650,000 | 25 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Health Center | Milagrosa Health Center | 114 | 3,000,000 | 70 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Phase 3 Health Center | 72 | 1,100,000 | 30 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Phase 4 Health Center | 96 | 1,700,000 | 50 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
School | Milagrosa Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Milagrosa West Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 240 | 4,000,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes
| |||
Brgy 13 | Bridge | Cedar Bridge | 50 |
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Day Care Center | Lantic Day Care Center | 70 | 900,000 | 30 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Paligawan Matanda Day Care Center | 70 | 900,000 | 30 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Davilan Day Care Center | 42 | 450,000 | 10 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
Health Center | Lantic Health Center | 64 | 1,000,000 | 50 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Carmona Estate Health Center | 100 | 1,250,000 | 50 patients | Concrete | Very Good | Yes | ||||
PaligawanMatanda Health Center | 105 | 1,600,000 | 30 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||||
School | Lantic Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Brgy Hall | Lantic Brgy Hall | 240 | 3,850,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Decision Area/s | Technical Findings | Implications | Policy Interventions | |||||||
A | B | C | D | |||||||
All Lifelines | 1. Categorized as low risk but the impact is severe affecting all lifelines in the Municipality particularly bridges. 2. Disruption of access system may last particularly bridges may last for days up to a month, affecting settlements and production areas | 1. Temporary isolation of communities due to long-term disruption of the access system due to ground shaking 2. Poses difficulty in evacuation and response making which may lead to death and injuries in isolated areas 3. Major disruption in the transportation of agricultural and industrial produce resulting in potential losses | 1. Strategic establishment of alternate/escape routes leading to relatively safer areas 2. Hazard proofing/reinforcement of lifeline facilities particularly bridges and national highways. 3. Establishment and institution of partner CSOs for immediate rehabilitation. 4. Formulation and institution of earthquake contingency plan. | |||||||
Decision Area/s | Technical Findings | Implications | Policy Interventions | |||||||
A | B | C | D | |||||||
All Population | 1. Population that will be severely affected by ground shaking are as follows: 4% living in makeshift houses; 31% are young and old; 0.7% are with disabilities; 4.9% are living below poverty threshold, and close to 1% are malnourished. | 1. As per REDAS, a total of 256 deaths, 4,924 injuries and 1,000 people will be missing in the event of intensity 8 earthquake. | 1. Conduct of regular earthquake drills and simulation exercises in all locations. 2. Conduct of IEC campaigns to inform populace of what to do, before, during and after and earthquake. 3. Capacitation and formation of rescue teams in every barangays and other sub-levels in the community. | |||||||
All Critical Facilities All Urban Use | 1. The risk for all critical facilities and urban use was determined low however, the severity of impact is very high. 2. The conditions of all infrastructures are generally good as most are newly constructed and/or rehabilitated. 3. There are a number of makeshift houses. | 1. It is assumed that in a worst case scenario, 800 makeshift houses will be destroyed while 400 makeshift dwellings will be partially damaged. 2. There will be a total of 345 million of damages to critical facilities. 3. Most urban use will be affected. | 1. Regular monitoring, rehabilitation and retrofitting of all infrastructures following the standards of the National Building Code. 2. Mandatory relocation of people living in makeshift housing and/or improvement/rehabilitation. | |||||||
Barangay | Total Land Area (Hectares) | Residential Area (Hectares) | Exposure indicators | |||||||
Barangay Population | Population Density per Hectare of Residential Area | |||||||||
Total Male | Total Female | Total Population | ||||||||
Barangay 1 | 12.93 | 10.24 | 1527 | 1548 | 3075 | 300.2929688 | ||||
Barangay 2 | 3.27 | 3.25 | 329 | 311 | 640 | 196.9230769 | ||||
Barangay 3 | 2.69 | 3.2 | 382 | 390 | 772 | 241.25 | ||||
Barangay 4 | 3 | 3.82 | 294 | 331 | 625 | 163.6125654 | ||||
Barangay 5 | 2.46 | 2.6 | 283 | 313 | 596 | 229.2307692 | ||||
Barangay 6 | 2.78 | 2.56 | 393 | 382 | 775 | 302.734375 | ||||
Barangay 7 | 2.38 | 2.16 | 310 | 356 | 666 | 308.3333333 | ||||
Barangay 8 | 15.56 | 6.19 | 1459 | 1492 | 2951 | 476.7366721 | ||||
Barangay 9 | 255.37 | 40.59 | 4912 | 5089 | 10001 | 246.3907366 | ||||
Barangay 10 | 434.2 | 222.97 | 3407 | 3517 | 6924 | 31.05350496 | ||||
Barangay 11 | 369.22 | 85.38 | 4455 | 4581 | 9036 | 105.8327477 | ||||
Barangay 12 | 95.07 | 41.71 | 11246 | 11573 | 22819 | 547.0870295 | ||||
Barangay 13 | 1363.69 | 167 | 8157 | 8451 | 16608 | 99.4491018 | ||||
Total | 2, 562.62 | 591.67 | 37,154 | 38, 334 | 75, 488 |
| ||||
Barangay | Adaptive capacity | |||||||||
Wealth | Information | Infrastructure | Technology | Institution and Governance | Social Capital | |||||
Barangays 1-13 | – All barangays have 5% budget allocation for Gender and Development (GAD ) and Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) – The Local Government Unit may also provide assistance thru its 5% budget allocation for GAD and DRRM – Provision of livelihood support – Provision of health and educational services – Provision of disaster relief services | – Regular conduct of Community-Based Monitoring System (CBMS) – National Household Targeting System for Poverty Reduction (NHTS-PR) – Conduct of appropriate trainings and seminars on ground shaking and its related hazards – Establishment of Local Monitoring System (LMS) – Conduct of information, education and communication (IEC) campaigns | – placement and implementation of Early Warning Systems (EWS) – Establishment of permanent evacuation center/s – Institution of relocation programs – Retrofitting programs | – Conduct and continuous updating of Rapid Earthquake and Disaster Assessment thru REDAS -Securing of an earthquake intensity meter | – Adoption and implementation of RA 10121 – Strict enforcement of the National Building Code -Institution of local disaster risk reduction policies – Review and implementation of local Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) – Updating and strict implementation of Local Zoning Ordinance | – Strengthening and development of appropriate programs thru Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) – Sourcing out CSO-PO partnership networks – Sourcing and establishing Academe Partners – Mandatory creation and mobilization of rescue teams for highly susceptible organizations (i.e. industries, groups, company, etc.) | ||||
Brgy | Exposure indicators | Sensitivity indicators | ||||||||
Type | Name | Area (sq. meters) | Estimated construction cost (Php) |
Capacity (classrooms, bed capacity, loading capacity) | Wall materials used | Existing condition | Structure employing hazard resistant design | |||
Brgy 1 | Health Center | Barangay 1 Health Center | 50 | 700,000 | 20 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 120 | 1,600,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Brgy 2 | Day Care Center | Barangay 2 Day Care Center |
|
| 20 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Hospital | Pagamutang Bayan ng Carmona |
|
| 25 beds | Concrete | Fair | Yes | |||
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 110 | 1,500,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Brgy 3 | Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 96 | 1,800,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Brgy 4 | Health Center | Main Health Center | 560 | 11,000,000 | 150 patients | Concrete | Very Good | Yes | ||
Government Building | Municipal Hall | 2150 | 34,000,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Evacuation | Hon. Marciano Mapanoo Park | 1680 | 10,000,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 120 | 1,600,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Brgy 5 | Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 70 | 1,100,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Brgy 6 | Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 80 | 1,350,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Brgy 7 | Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 130 | 2,200,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Brgy 8 | Day Care Center | Rosario Day Care Center | 56 | 700,000 | 15 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Health Center | Barangay 8 Health Center | 56 | 700,000 | 30 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
School | Carmona Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
| Carmona National High School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 120 | 1,500,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Brgy 9 | Bridge | Maduya Bridge |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
| SLEX Bridge |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
| CPM Bridge |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Government Building | DILG Compound | 1 626 | 25,000,000 |
| Concrete |
| Yes | |||
Day Care Center | Maduya Day Care Center | 110 | 1,100,000 | 25 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Health Center | Maduya Health Center | 120 | 1,100,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
School | Maduya Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
| CvSU |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Barangay Hall | Maduya Barangay Hall | 150 | 2,000,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Brgy 10 | Day Care Center | Hon. Marcelino L. Basbas Sr. DCC | 70 | 900,000 | 30 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Health Center | Cabilang Baybay Health Center | 56 | 500,000 | 40 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
School | Cabilang Baybay Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 160 | 2,000,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
BRGY 11 | Bridge | Mabuhay Bridge |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
Day Care Center | Mabuhay Day Care Center | 70 | 900,000 | 30 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Health Center | Mabuhay Health Center | 100 | 1,400,000 | 50 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
School | Mabuhay Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 200 | 2,500,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
BRGY 12 | Bridge | Milagrosa Bridge (MC) |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
| Milagrosa-Lantic Bridge |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Day Care Center | Milagrosa Proper Day Care Center | 64 | 850,000 | 15 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
| Phase 4 Day Care Center | 90 | 1,400,000 | 25 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
| Phase 3 Day Care Center | 64 | 850,000 | 25 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
| Phase 2 Day Care Center | 56 | 650,000 | 25 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Health Center | Milagrosa Health Center | 114 | 3,000,000 | 70 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
| Phase 3 Health Center | 72 | 1,100,000 | 30 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
| Phase 4 Health Center | 96 | 1,700,000 | 50 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
School | Milagrosa Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
| Milagrosa West Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Barangay Hall | Barangay Hall | 240 | 4,000,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
BRGY 13 | BridgeDay Care Center | Cedar Bridge | 50 |
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | ||
| Lantic Day Care Center | 70 | 900,000 | 30 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
Health Center | Paligawan Matanda Day Care Center | 70 | 900,000 | 30 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
| Davilan Day Care Center | 42 | 450,000 | 10 children | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
| Lantic Health Center | 64 | 1,000,000 | 50 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
| Carmona Estate Health Center | 100 | 1,250,000 | 50 patients | Concrete | Very Good | Yes | |||
School Barangay Hall | Paligawan Matanda Health Center | 105 | 1,600,000 | 30 patients | Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
| Lantic Elementary School |
|
|
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
| Lantic Barangay Hall | 240 | 3,850,000 |
| Concrete | Good | Yes | |||
BRGY | Exposure indicators | Sensitivity indicators | ||||||||
Road Name | Road Classification | Replacement Cost per linear kilometer | Surface Type | Existing Condition | Hazard Resistant Design | |||||
BRGY 1 | San Pablo St | Municipal | 9,130,000 | Asphalt | Poor | No | ||||
BRGY 2 | San Jose St | Municipal | 4,930,000 | Concrete | Good | YES | ||||
BRGY 3 | San Jose St | Municipal | 5,070,000 | Concrete | Good | YES | ||||
BRGY 4 | JM Loyola St | Municipal | 5,020,000 | Concrete | Good | YES | ||||
BRGY 5 | JM Loyola St | Municipal | 4,180,000 | Concrete | Good | YES | ||||
BRGY 6 | Magallanes St | Municipal | 5,000,000 | Concrete | Good | YES | ||||
BRGY 7 | Magallanes St | Municipal | 4,730,000 | Concrete | Good | YES | ||||
BRGY 8 | Rosario | Barangay | 960,000 | Concrete | Fair | No | ||||
Brgy 9 | JM Loyola St | Municipal | 6,320,000 | Concrete | Good | YES | ||||
Mayor’s Blvd | Barangay | 37,060,000 | Concrete | Fair | No | |||||
Dahlia | Municipal | 5,000,000 | Concrete | Poor | No | |||||
Governor’s Drive | National road | 18,350,000 | Concrete | Fair | YES | |||||
Brgy 10 | Governor’s Drive | National road | 19,840,000 | Concrete | Fair | YES | ||||
BRGY 11 | Governor’s Drive | National road | 32,160,000 | Concrete | Good | YES | ||||
Sugar Road (access road to evacuation center) | Barangay | 28,060,000 | Concrete | Fair | YES | |||||
Hebron | Barangay | 1,770,000 | Concrete | Fair | YES | |||||
JM Loyola St | Municipal | 12,470,000 | Concrete | Good | YES | |||||
BRGY 12 | Sta. Maria | Barangay | 10,510,000 | Concrete | Fair | YES | ||||
Sta. Rosa | Barangay | 5,070,000 | Concrete | Fair | YES | |||||
Patindig-Araw | Barangay | 9,380,000 | Concrete | Poor | No | |||||
BRGY 13 | Domingo C CarilloSr | Barangay | 12,070,000 | Concrete | Fair | No | ||||
Decision Area/s | Technical Findings | Implications | Policy Interventions | |||||||
A | B | C | D | |||||||
Barangay Maduya Barangay Cabilang Baybay | 1. Categorized as moderate risk 2. _____exposed to high susceptible flood areas, with an estimated flood height of > 1 meter. The estimated likelihood of occurrence is 3-6 years. 3. Disruption of access system may last for or five days, affecting settlements and production areas 4. LGU does not have the capacity to pursue road improvement related projects. | 1. Temporary isolation of communities due to long-term disruption of the access system during floods 2. Poses difficulty in evacuation and response making which may lead to death to deaths and injuries in isolated areas 3. Major disruption in the transportation of agricultural produce resulting in potential losses | 1. Strategic establishment of alternate/escape routes leading to relatively safer areas 2. Climate proofing of existing route through road and drainage upgrading in coordination with NGAs 3. Pre-emptive evacuation of areas that will be potentially isolated during floods 4. Formulation of flood contingency plans targeting potentially affected communities | |||||||
Population | 1. Populace to be affected by low to moderate risk in all barangays except Barangay Bancal. 2. Moderate effects can be assumed at Barangays 8, Maduya and Cabilang Baybay. | 1. High incidence of water-related diseases and illnesses. 2. High incidence of vector-borne diseases and illnesses. | 1. Provision for improved medical support such as immunization, medicines and the like. 2. Proper IEC on overall cleanliness to avoid spread of diseases and illnesses. 3. Provision of WASH facilities if the need arises. | |||||||
Agriculture | 1. Low to moderate risk in flood prone areas particularly in Barangay Maduya and Cabilang Baybay. 2. Rice as the primary agricultural produce to be affected. | 1. Damages to crops particularly rice in Barangay Maduya. | 1. Provision of alternative livelihood. 2. Assistance for crop insurance. 3. Use of flood-resilient rice varieties. | |||||||
Climate Stimuli
| Impact Area
| Areas of Concerns | ||||||||
System/s of Interest | Development Sectors | |||||||||
Increase in Temperature | Potential increase of temperature per annum by 1.025 °C from 2000 to 2020. Further temperatures will increase per annum by 1.975 °C from 2020 to 2050. Specifically, projected mean temperatures for the months of DJF will increase by 1.0 °C, 1.2 °C in MAM, 0.9 °C JJA and 1.0 °C for SON. | All Barangays | All Barangays: Population, Critical Facilities, Urban Use, and Lifeline Facilities | Environment, Social, Infrastructure, Institution, Economic | ||||||
Barangays 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14: Natural Resources (Agricultural areas) | ||||||||||
Decrease in Rainfall | Potential decrease of rainfall by 10.2mm from 2000 to 2020. Further, rainfall will decrease by -4.875mm from 2020 to 2050. Specifically, projected rainfall for the months of DJF and MAM decreases by 26.1and 28.2, respectively, while increases in the months of JJA and SON by 13.1 and 0.4, respectively. | All Barangays | All Barangays: Population, Critical Facilities, Urban Use and Lifeline Facilities | Environment, Social, Infrastructure, Institution, Economic | ||||||
Barangays 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14: Natural Resources (Agricultural areas) | ||||||||||
Climate Stimuli
| Impact Area
| Areas of Concerns | ||||||||
System/s of Interest | Development Sectors | |||||||||
Increase in Extreme Rainfall Event | Extreme rainfall events are projected to be frequent. | All Barangays | All Barangays: Population, Critical Facilities, Urban Use and Lifeline Facilities | Environment, Social, Infrastructure, Institution, Economic | ||||||
Barangays 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14: Natural Resources (Agricultural areas) | ||||||||||
Increase in Hot Days | Potential umber of hotter days increases, from 630 days observed during 1971-2000 the no. hot days for 2020 is projected to increase by almost triple and by almost 5 times for 2050. | All Barangays | All Barangays: Population, Critical Facilities, Urban Use and Lifeline Facilities | Environment, Social, Infrastructure, Institution, Economic | ||||||
Barangays 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14: Natural Resources (Agricultural areas) | ||||||||||
Increase in Dry Days | Number of projected dry days decreases, by almost 1000 days for 2020 and 2050. | All Barangays | All Barangays: Population, Critical Facilities, Urban Use and Lifeline Facilities | Environment, Social, Infrastructure, Institution, Economic | ||||||
Barangays 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14: Natural Resources (Agricultural areas) | ||||||||||
Barangay | Degree of impact score | Adaptive capacity score | Vulnerability | |||||||
E | F | G | ||||||||
Vulnerability Index | Vulnerability Score | |||||||||
Barangay 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 9 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Moderate | ||||||
Barangay 10 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Moderate | ||||||
Barangay 11 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Moderate | ||||||
Barangay 12 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Moderate | ||||||
Barangay 13 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Moderate | ||||||
Barangay 14 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Moderate | ||||||
Barangay | Degree of impact score | Adaptive capacity score | Vulnerability | |||||||
E | F | G | ||||||||
Vulnerability Index | Vulnerability Score | |||||||||
Barangay 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 7 | 1 | 2 | 2 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 8 | 1 | 2 | 2 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 9 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Moderate | ||||||
Barangay 10 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Moderate | ||||||
Barangay 11 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Moderate | ||||||
Barangay 12 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Moderate | ||||||
Barangay 13 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Moderate | ||||||
Barangay 14 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Moderate | ||||||
Barangay | Degree of impact score | Adaptive capacity score | Vulnerability | |||||||
Vulnerability Index | Vulnerability Score | |||||||||
Barangay 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 8 | 3 | 2 | 6 | Moderate | ||||||
Barangay 9 | 3 | 2 | 6 | Moderate | ||||||
Barangay 10 | 3 | 2 | 6 | Moderate | ||||||
Barangay 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 12 | 2 | 1 | 2 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Barangay 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Low | ||||||
Decision Area/s | Technical Findings | Implications | Policy Interventions | |||||||
Climate Stimuli: Increase in Temperature, Hot Days, and Dry Days and Decrease in Rainfall | ||||||||||
Population: All Barangays | 1. Based on the data given, temperature will increase per annum by 1.025 °C from 2000 to 2020. Further temperatures will increase per annum by 1.975 °C from 2020 to 2050. Specifically, projected mean temperatures for the months of DJF will increase by 1.0 °C, 1.2 °C in MAM, 0.9 °C JJA and 1.0 °C for SON. 2. Based on the data given, rainfall will decrease by 10.2mm from 2000 to 2020. Further, rainfall will decrease by -4.875mm from 2020 to 2050. Specifically, projected rainfall for the months of DJF and MAM decreases by 26.1and 28.2, respectively, while increases in the months of JJA and SON by 13.1 and 0.4, respectively. 3. A total of 124 families with approximately 199 hectares of rice, 41 hectares of banana and 1 hectare of mango plantation will be affected among others | 1. Increase in heat-related diseases and illnesses. 2. Shortage of water supply for urban use. 3. Discomfort to vulnerable groups such as young, old, pregnant and persons with disabilities. | 1. Provision of additional medical support to the populace prioritizing vulnerable groups such as young, old, pregnant and persons with disabilities. 2. Promotion of the use of rainwater harvesting systems particularly at the household levels as alternative and additional water supply. 3. Promotion of the use of alternative power sources such as solar panels and incentivize those with such to mitigate high consumption. | |||||||
Agricultural Areas: Barangay 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1. Decrease in overall productivity of crops particularly rice, banana and mango. 2. High water demand vis-a-vis lower water supply. 3. Pest infestation and other crop-related diseases may occur. 4. Diminishing local food supply and higher external supply needed. | 1. Promotion of climate-resilient crops/varieties and providing incentives to famers adopting such. 2. Institutionalization of varied crop rotation with technical and financial assistance. 3. Establishment of alternative water source (now dependent on ground water) such as water impounding dam and the like for additional water supply. 4. Provision of alternative livelihood to affected agricultural families. | ||||||||
Critical Facilities: All Barangays | 1. Increase in the utilization of sources due high incidences of diseases and illnesses. 2. Strain in manpower and resources available to cater the increase in services to be provided. | 1. Annual increase of budget and resources to cater increasing services to be provided. 2. Mandatory improvement of facilities vis-à-vis arising needs of the populace. 3. Regular maintenance of critical facilities. | ||||||||
Decision Area/s | Technical Findings | Implications | Policy Interventions | |||||||
Lifeline Facilities: All Barangays | 1. Strain to lifeline facilities that may cause damages. | 1. Regular monitoring and maintenance of all lifeline facilities. | ||||||||
Urban Use: All Barangays | 1. High risk of fire incidences. 2. Damages to infrastructures. 3. Low water supply. | 1. Provision for flexi time work to uplift workers’ productivity. 2. Mandatory insurance for all facilities, if needed. 3. Sourcing out of additional water supply for all purposes. | ||||||||
Climate Stimuli: Increase in Extreme Rainfall Event | ||||||||||
Population: All Barangays | Extreme rainfall events are projected to be frequent. | 1. Increase in water-borne diseases and illnesses. 2. Increase in immune-related diseases. 3. Power outage as well as disruption in water supply. 4. Flooding and intense rains may cause damages to residential units especially those living in makeshift houses. | 1. Provision of additional medical support to the populace prioritizing vulnerable groups such as young, old, pregnant and persons with disabilities. 2. Provision of housing loans/relocation for those living in makeshift houses and those living in highly vulnerable areas. 3. Promotion of disaster bags for every households. | |||||||
Agricultural Areas: Barangay 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1. Flooding inundating agricultural areas. 2. Reduced agricultural productivity. 3. Reduced farming families’ income. | 1. Promotion of climate-resilient crops/varieties and providing incentives to famers adopting such. 2. Institutionalization of varied crop rotation with technical and financial assistance. 3. Provision of alternative livelihood to affected agricultural families. | ||||||||
Critical Facilities: All Barangays | 1. Damages to critical facilities. 2. Increase in services to be provided to cater increasing incidences of diseases and illnesses. 3. Disruption to delivery of services. | 1. Annual increase of budget and resources to cater increasing services to be provided. 2. Mandatory improvement of facilities vis-à-vis arising needs of the populace. 3. Regular maintenance of critical facilities. 4. Transfer of critical facilities if necessary to areas not vulnerable to the climate stimuli. | ||||||||
Decision Area/s | Technical Findings | Implications | Policy Interventions | |||||||
Lifeline Facilities: All Barangays | 1. Damages to lifeline facilities. 2. Disruption to delivery of services. | 1. Regular monitoring and maintenance of all lifeline facilities. | ||||||||
Urban Use: All Barangays |